James Cook and Benjamin Franklin
James Cook departed on his last voyage eight days after the adoption of the Declaration of Independence (4 July 1776). The official account of that voyage was published on 4 June 1784, less than a month after the final ratification of the Treaty of Paris (12 May 1784), which concluded the American War of Independence.
The coincidence of these two historic events converged in the public sphere on 10 March 1779 with the publication of Benjamin Franklinâ€™s open letter ordering American sea captains, if they happened to encounter him, to treat Cook and his crew â€˜with all civility and kindness â€¦ as common friends to mankindâ€™.
The letter received considerable press coverage at the time. Opinions about it were sharply divided. On 26 May 1779, after summarizing its contents, Lloydâ€™s Evening Post ends with a quotation from Swift: â€˜See, Brothers, how we Apples swimâ€™. The line, spoken by a ball of â€˜horseâ€™s dungâ€™, clearly implies that Franklinâ€™s support for Cookâ€™s voyage is nothing but a vain attempt to share in its glory.
The Whig-leaning Public Advertiser, in contrast, used the letter to voice anti-war sentiments. On 7 June 1779 a whimsical article imagines Cook being captured by an American ship. On discovering his identity, the Americans follow Franklinâ€™s orders and present him with â€˜Half a hundred Weight of right Virginia Tobacco, three Bags of Riceâ€™, and other produce plundered from â€˜a Portugueze Vesselâ€™. In referencing their highly profitable trading relations and their shared enemy, the â€˜Portuguezeâ€™, the article stresses the economic and political importance of the relationship between Britain and America.
A similar note is struck by the Morning Chronicle and London Advertiserâ€™s response to news of Cookâ€™s death, communicated in a letter from Charles Clerke from Kamchatka, a place that in the 18th century was used as a metaphor for distance and coldness:
â€˜Had we been born in an island in the South-Seas, we should perhaps have called [Cook] an invader, a pirate. â€¦The most striking circumstance surely is, that Captain Clerke should sit down in the Bay of St. Peter and Paul at Kamschatka, and write a letter to Mr. Stephens, at Charing-cross, which, in about half a year, reaches him as safely, as if it had been put into a penny-post-officeâ€¦ This is civilization; nor should we forget the friendly assistance of the Russians, any more than the French order, respecting Captain Cookâ€™.
The greatest achievements of the voyage, the article suggests, were not so much Cookâ€™s discoveries but the co-operation and free lines of communication between potentially warring powers that enabled these discoveries to happen and to be so promptly reported on.
As a counterpoint to the hostilities between Britain, France and America in the Atlantic, therefore, Cookâ€™s voyages in the Pacific were seen, by some at least, as a way of promoting unity between so-called â€˜Enlightenedâ€™ countries â€“ les Ã©tats bien policÃ©s (well-governed states) â€“ whose destinies were presented as increasingly more entwined by commercial links and shared mÅ“urs or â€˜polite mannersâ€™.
PhD Candidate, Department of History of Art, University College London
Copy of pass by Benjamin Franklin, 10 March 1779, State Library New South Wales, Dixson Library, MSQ140
Lloyd's Evening Post (London, England), 26 May- 28 May 1779; Issue 3421
Jonathan Swift, â€˜On the words Brother-Protestants, and Fellow-Christians, so familiarly used by the advocates for the Repeal of the Test Act in Ireland,â€™  in The Works of Dr. Jonathan Swift, Vol. VII, London: T. Osborne et al., 1766, p. 206
Public Advertiser (London, England), 7 June 1779; Issue 13935
Sophie Forgan, â€˜A note on the â€˜Afterlife of Kamchatka,â€™ in Smoking Coasts and Ice-Bound Seas: Cookâ€™s Voyage to the Arctic, Whitby: Captain Cook Memorial Museum, 2008, pp. 33-40
Morning Chronicle and London Advertiser (London, England), 17 January 1780; Issue 3327
Visit our exhibition James Cook: The Voyages
Open until 28 August 2018